Zambia's transition to climate-aligned mobility requires selecting the most suitable electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure model to balance cost, resilience, and inclusivity. This study compares a dual “Battery Swapping + Charging” model with a “Charging-Only” model using a multi-criteria framework encompassing infrastructure cost, standardization needs, technology lock-in risk, operating economics, safety, grid integration, environmental footprint, consumer acceptance, and fleet uptime. Drawing on international benchmarks, Sub-Saharan Africa use cases, and Zambia-specific conditions, the analysis finds that while Charging-Only is simpler and less costly to deploy, the dual model delivers greater fleet uptime, operational resilience, and grid-load management potential, particularly in high-utilization corridors. However, the dual model requires higher capital investment and strong regulatory action on battery-pack standardization and safety protocols. The findings suggest that a phased, standards-led rollout targeting fleet-intensive sectors, coupled with technician training, forecourt conversion, and second-life battery frameworks, can accelerate adoption while creating green jobs and supporting energy-transition goals. Early fiscal incentives and grid-smart siting are critical to de-risk investment and enable widespread uptake.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Simwaba
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Simwaba (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c183f09b7b07f3a060f8a1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.1029.v1