Advances in AI portend a new era of sophisticated disinformation operations. While individual AI systems already create convincing—and at times misleading—information, an imminent development is the emergence of malicious AI swarms. These systems can coordinate covertly, infiltrate communities, evade traditional detectors, and run continuous A/B tests, with round-the-clock persistence. The result can include fabricated grassroots consensus, fragmented shared reality, mass harassment, voter micro-suppression or mobilization, contamination of AI training data, and erosion of institutional trust. With increasing vulnerabilities in democratic processes worldwide, we urge a three-pronged response: (1) platform-side defenses—always-on swarm-detection dashboards, pre-election highfidelity swarm-simulation stress-tests, transparency audits, and optional client-side “AI shields” for users; (2) model-side safeguards—standardized persuasion-risk tests, provenance-authenticating passkeys, and watermarking; and (3) system-level oversight—a UN-backed AI Influence Observatory.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Thilo Schroeder
Meeyoung Cha
Andrea Baronchelli
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schroeder et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9051b41e1c178a14f4ccd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qm9yk_v3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: