As generative AI tools reshape how students think, write, and solve problems, education systemsare faced with a pivotal choice: restrict or reform. This conceptual paper argues for reformthrough three interconnected lenses—pedagogical transformation, curriculum redesign, andinstitutional adaptation, grounded in the theories of cognitive offloading and critical pedagogy.Drawing on both historical parallels and contemporary research, we demonstrate that generativeAI, when thoughtfully integrated, can support rather than undermine learning, creativity, andstudent agency. The paper critiques policy responses centered on bans and academic integrity,and instead proposes inclusive, ethical, and process-centered uses of AI in the classroom. Keyrecommendations include embedding critical AI literacy across curricula, redesigningassessments to reward intellectual effort, and supporting educators through policy innovation andprofessional development. We conclude by outlining future research directions to betterunderstand how generative AI is reshaping cognitive development, student learning, and theinstitutional structures of education.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jain et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68da58dcc1728099cfd112ee — DOI: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/zakwe_v1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Nikhil Jain
M. C. Kiran
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...