Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract As technology improves, artificial systems are increasingly able to behave in human-like ways: holding a conversation; providing information, advice, and support; or taking on the role of therapist, teacher, or counsellor. This enhanced behavioural complexity, we argue, encourages deeper forms of affective engagement on the part of the human user, with the artificial agent helping to stabilise, subdue, prolong, or intensify a person’s emotional condition. Here, we defend a fictionalist account of human/AI interaction, according to which these encounters involve an elaborate practise of imaginative pretence: a make-believe in which the artificial agent is attributed a life of its own. We attend, specifically, to the temporal characteristics of these fictions, and to what we imagine artificial agents are doing when we are not looking at them.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Krueger et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f5edb6db64358766ffec — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10046-7
Joel Krueger
Tom Roberts
Topoi
University of Exeter
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: