Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a key component in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer, with pathologic complete response (pCR) varying by molecular subtype. This study evaluates pCR rates following NACT in a Lebanese cohort, stratified by molecular and clinicopathological features. Methods: This retrospective cohort included 187 women with stage T1–T4, N1, M0 breast cancer treated at the American University of Beirut Medical Center between 2010 and 2016. Molecular subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, triple-negative) were determined by immunohistochemistry and/or FISH. pCR was defined as ypT0N0. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of pCR. Results: The median age was 45 years. Molecular subtype distribution was: Luminal A (28.9%), Luminal B (45.5%), HER2-positive (11.8%), and triple-negative (13.9%). Overall pCR was achieved in 12.8% (24/187) of patients. pCR rates significantly differed across molecular subtypes: HER2-enriched 45.5%, Luminal B 11.8%, triple-negative 11.5%, and Luminal A 1.9% (p = 0.005). Axillary involvement was also significantly associated with pCR (p 0.001), while clinical T stage, tumor grade, focality/centricity, and chemotherapy regimen showed no significant associations. In multivariable logistic regression, molecular subtype remained an independent predictor of pCR (p = 0.002). Conclusion pCR rates varied markedly among molecular subtypes, being highest in HER2-enriched tumors and lowest in Luminal A. These findings support molecular subtype as a key determinant of treatment response and highlight its role in guiding neoadjuvant treatment strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Malak Ghezzawi
Mohamad Hadi El Charif
Lynn Lteif
Frontiers in Oncology
American University of Beirut
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ghezzawi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/694035d82d562116f290863c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1670594
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: