Ontological Non-Closure - On the Structural Limits of Agency and Systemic Self-Legitimation

Ontological Non-Closure is a canonical constraint framework describing the structural impossibility of total self-legitimation in coherent systems. Rather than proposing a metaphysical doctrine or an epistemic limitation, it formalizes a transversal no-go: no system can fully internalize the conditions that make its own coherence possible without destabilizing itself. The limitation is not computational, informational, or methodological. It is structural, arising from the requirement that any coherent system must contain an internal legitimacy operator while being unable to fully legitimate that operator from within. Attempts at closure do not converge toward completion. They converge toward three stable structural regimes: illusion, frigidity, and collapse. Illusion corresponds to declarative pseudo-closure. Frigidity corresponds to overconstraint and loss of adaptive degrees of freedom. Collapse corresponds to degeneracy, where operational distinctions degrade and coherence becomes unrecoverable. These regimes are not contingent failures but attractor outcomes produced whenever closure is forced. To render this no-go operable rather than merely prohibitive, the framework introduces the notion of surfaces: locally coherent regions situated inside the system’s admissible descriptive space, yet globally non-integrable. Surfaces define bounded corridors where coherence persists without scaling to totality. They function as structural instruments: coherence is maintained not through completeness, but through refusal at the boundary of non-integrability. From this follows a central consequence: agency cannot be fully recognized, justified, or legitimized inside the systems it renders coherent. Agency appears at surfaces as a structural remainder, repeatedly misrecognized as deviance, irrationality, or threat. The framework therefore defines fractal agency as a distributed mode of operation across multiple surfaces, none of which can serve as a global closure center. Ontological Non-Closure operates prior to optimization, dynamics, metrics, and learning. It introduces no global ordering, no objective function, and no complete representational program. Instead, it specifies the structural conditions under which coherence can persist at all, and where attempts at totalization necessarily fail. The framework does not compete with existing theories of logic, computation, or systems science. It constrains the conditions under which such theories can be legitimately applied. © 2026 ΔR7 / KoRVersion: V2License: CC BY-NC 4.0Status: Canonical structural no-go frameworkDistribution: PDF / Zenodo / IPFS / TraceLockTraceLock ID: a794309608b4d2ae2e0a8791a3bd60a0ef753ca2848fa044322e8f24eaa45b02