This study introduces repeated-run probabilistic drift analysis under invariant artifact and contract conditions across three configuration states within a single kernel lineage: instrumented restraint (K0 + K0G-M), measurement-only instrumentation (K0G-M), and instrumental governance (K0G). Fifteen independent runs were executed and aggregated within an Operational Boundary Metrics (OBM) measurement surface. Results demonstrate that probabilistic drift geometry is configuration-sensitive. Instrumented restraint produces the smallest dispersion envelope. Measurement-only states expose maximal structured variance. Governance produces state-dependent compression relative to elevated dispersion but does not compress below the instrumented restraint baseline (K0 + K0G-M). These findings are descriptive and confined to the declared artifact and measurement grammar. The paper formalizes probabilistic drift geometry as a structured object consisting of dispersion magnitude, layer concentration, regime stability, deviation-set coherence, and interaction curvature across configurations. The contribution is methodological rather than prescriptive: architectural configuration measurably alters the probabilistic envelope of inference under invariant conditions. Transparency of boundary logic, instrumentation state, and governance activation becomes empirically relevant under configuration-sensitive drift. No normative ranking or task-class mapping is proposed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Franky Schaut
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Franky Schaut (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70f8531e4c4a9ff5b3ef — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18860500
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: