This companion paper summarizes AI-to-AI Diplomacy for decision-makers who need a clear, audit-friendly way to evaluate AI-to-AI interoperability in high-stakes settings. The central point is practical: as “agentic” systems begin to negotiate access, policy and coordination across organizational boundaries, natural language becomes a weak commitment substrate. Under zero trust, ambiguity and persuasion are exploit paths; institutions need deterministic, replayable commitment formation. The paper introduces the Diplomatic Layer: a minimal protocol boundary that separates conversation from commitment. Systems may negotiate in language but binding agreements are expressed as Proof-Carrying Compacts – canonical objects verified deterministically with stable reason codes and replayable decision records. The brief also explains why public evidence must be published in two tiers: Tier-0 is public-safe integrity evidence designed for inspection without increasing attack surface, while Tier-1 is controlled-access verification for qualified reviewers requiring deeper reconstruction and due diligence. This paper is not a compliance filing and does not claim EU AI Act certification or regulatory conformity. It is a protocol and evidence posture intended to support evaluation, critique and replication in EU AI Act-relevant and mission-critical contexts. Series links (Project Orion): The Sentinel Life Equation (SLE): A Proposed Dynamical Framework for AI Continuity and Alignment – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17575603 The Cage Paradox: A Thought Experiment on Stability, Drift and the Evolution of Intelligent Systems – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17691117 The Cage Paradox: A Thought Experiment on Stability, Drift and the Evolution of Intelligent Systems – A Non-Technical Introduction to Sentinel-Grade AI – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17691383 Sentinel-Grade AI: Continuity Without Cages – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18750012 Sentinel-Grade AI: Continuity Without Cages – Non-Technical Companion – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18750318 AI-to-AI Diplomacy: Why LLM-Only Negotiation Fails Under Zero Trust and How SLE-Governed Systems Enable Proof-Carrying Compacts – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881155 AI-to-AI Diplomacy: Proof-Carrying Compacts for Zero-Trust AI-to-AI Interoperability – Non-Technical Companion – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18881281 Project Hub replay deterministic verification on canonical objects; reproduce reported aggregates. Tier-1 verification: controlled-access review for qualified reviewers requiring deeper reconstruction without increasing public attack surface. Audience line:Program managers, mission assurance stakeholders, regulated adopters in high-risk environments, critical infrastructure leadership, institutional due diligence teams and regulators/auditors evaluating zero-trust interoperability. Disclaimer line:Independent research preprint. Not a compliance filing, certification claim or regulatory conformity assessment. References to EU AI Act are contextual (“EU AI Act-relevant”), not a claim of conformity. Not affiliated with any employer or institution.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Behzad Farmand
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Behzad Farmand (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc2175af8044f7a4eb4d2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18881280
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: