A general formula (α) of which a special case is the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of equivalence is shown to be the mean of all split-half coefficients resulting from different splittings of a test. α is therefore an estimate of the correlation between two random samples of items from a universe of items like those in the test. α is found to be an appropriate index of equivalence and, except for very short tests, of the first-factor concentration in the test. Tests divisible into distinct subtests should be so divided before using the formula. The index 12ptminimal amsmath wasysym amsfonts amssymb amsbsy mathrsfs upgreek -69pt document r₈₉ document, derived from α, is shown to be an index of inter-item homogeneity. Comparison is made to the Guttman and Loevinger approaches. Parallel split coefficients are shown to be unnecessary for tests of common types. In designing tests, maximum interpretability of scores is obtained by increasing the first-factor concentration in any separately-scored subtest and avoiding substantial group-factor clusters within a subtest. Scalability is not a requisite.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lee J. Cronbach
Psychometrika
University of Illinois System
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lee J. Cronbach (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6b772e328128020aa81a1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: