Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There is compelling evidence that globalization shocks, often working through culture and identity, have played an important role in driving up support for populist movements, particularly of the right-wing kind. I start with an empirical analysis of the 2016 presidential election in the United States to show that globalization-related attitudinal variables were important correlates of the switch to Trump. I then provide a conceptual framework that identifies four distinct channels through which globalization can stimulate populism, two each on the demand and supply sides of politics. I evaluate the empirical literature with the help of this framework, discussing trade, financial globalization, and immigration separately. I conclude the review by discussing some apparently anomalous cases in which populists have been against, rather than in favor of, trade protection.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dani Rodrik
Annual Review of Economics
Harvard University
John F. Kennedy University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dani Rodrik (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d74e7bf07a12db70b8a934 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-070220-032416
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: