Dynamic fee market mechanisms, exemplified by EIP-1559, have been extensively studied for Ethereum’s 12 s block environment but remain uncharacterized at sub-second timescales. We present an agent-based simulation study of an EIP-1559 adaptation for Injective, a Layer 1 blockchain combining native EVM compatibility with CometBFT consensus, operating at 600 ms block times. Across twelve simulation runs (four parameter configurations × three demand scenarios), our analysis yields three findings: (1) temporal smoothing mechanisms (MA-25, 25-block trailing average) produce mixed effects in sub-second environments with up to 47% basefee overshoot during spam attacks and slight smoothing elsewhere, making per-block mechanisms preferable for consistent performance; (2) transitioning from 150M (66.66% target) to 300M (50% target) configuration reduces peak fees by 31% during variable demand; during spam attacks, the 300M configuration peaks 32% higher but recovers faster with block capacity as the primary driver for spam throughput; and (3) per-block mechanisms establish initial spam barriers within 17–32 s versus Ethereum’s 4–6 min, economically justifying lower minimum fees. We provide the first systematic sub-second EIP-1559 analysis and a parameter optimization framework for high-throughput chains. With proper tuning, dynamic fee mechanisms are compatible with high-throughput architectures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Petar Zhivkov
Eric Chen
Mathematics
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Inje University
Angel Kanchev University of Ruse
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhivkov et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893c96c1944d70ce04c71 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math14071232
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: