Heat pipe cooled reactors rely on heat pipes for passive heat transfer and exhibit high reliability and compactness. Therefore, they are considered candidate nuclear reactor systems for future deep space exploration missions. To enable a deeper investigation of heat pipe reactor systems, particularly the transient response characteristics of the core, a transient coupled analysis framework is developed based on the multi-physics coupling code MOOSE. This framework includes the core heat transfer module, point kinetics module, heat pipe module, and Stirling engine module. A novel strategy that allows two distinct heat pipe models to be simultaneously invoked within a single simulation in MOOSE is developed. All modules are developed within the MOOSE framework and do not rely on any external programs. The heat pipe module is validated using experimental data from heat pipe startup and operation tests within the maximum relative error of only 0.45%. The entire coupled framework is validated against the KRUSTY operational experiments and is compared with other multi-physics models, demonstrating higher accuracy within the maximum relative error of only 13.7% in core load variation conditions. Meanwhile, transient coupled analyses of the KRUSTY reactor are performed to evaluate its safety performance under accident conditions. In the hypothetical positive reactivity step insertion accident and heat pipe failure accidents, the KRUSTY core exhibits excellent safety performance. And the mechanism of heat pipe power redistribution following heat pipe failure is examined in detail.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Honghui Xu
Naiwen Zhang
Yuhan Fan
Energies
Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Shanghai University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8968f6c1944d70ce0804b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19081815
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: