Governance of socio-technical systems is typically treated as a design problem: write rules, enforce them, revise when necessary. This document proposes that governance systems exhibit a structural phase transition analogous to gelation in polymer chemistry and autocatalytic closure in origin-of-life theory. Two conjectures are stated in formally attackable terms. Conjecture A posits that increasing cross-linking density among governance artefacts, combined with a functioning enactment layer of agents and authority, induces a threshold-like transition from predominantly exogenous production of governance artefacts to partially endogenous reproduction and repair — a transition detectable via Reflexively Autocatalytic and Food-generated (RAF) set analysis. Conjecture B posits that in nonstationary, partially observable environments, static governance has a finite expected survival time, while governance systems equipped with sufficiently effective correction loops can maintain viability for substantially longer. The minimal transferable unit of self-sustaining governance is characterised as a tuple (R, , L, E_) comprising seed rules, a cross-linking mechanism, an emergent correction loop, and a minimum viable enactment layer. Neither conjecture is proven. Both generate testable predictions against a live governance system (Stirps). Falsification criteria, an evidence interpretation matrix, and a deferred empirical protocol are specified. The formal proof, if it exists, is a research programme requiring percolation theory, RAF detection algorithms, stochastic stability theory, and active inference formalism applied to formally specified governance network models.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Colin Bernhard Apel
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Colin Bernhard Apel (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b2ce4eeef8a2a6b029c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19551022
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: