Pollinators exhibit preferences and flower constancy (i.e., the proportion of visits to the same plant species) toward particular floral traits, which drive their decisions while foraging between flowers. Furthermore, pollinators adjust their preferences and flower constancy based on their experience with the flower reward, shaping their foraging behaviour and consequently pollen transfer. However, while evidence of the pollinators learning on their foraging is well known for bees, evidence for hoverflies is only slowly increasing although they represent one of the most abundant pollinator groups in temperate zones. We compared the preferences and flower constancy of flower naïve and experienced individuals of drone fly, Eristalis tenax L. (Syrphidae) in controlled, full-factorial experiments using artificial flowers differing in flower colour and size. Our results show that previous experience with flowers in an environment rich in flowering species decreased flower constancy and changed the preferences of E. tenax. We discuss the effect of changes in preferences and constancy on the E. tenax foraging among flowering plants.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jakub Štenc
Alice Haveldová
Eva Matoušková
Journal of Experimental Biology
Charles University
Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications
Chirastar KDT (Czechia)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Štenc et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2ba0e4eeef8a2a6b0a18 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.251711
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: