Ghost imaging (GI) is a typical computational imaging technique that reconstructs two-dimensional and three-dimensional images from one-dimensional bucket detector signals under structured light illumination. By utilizing single-pixel detection, this technology is particularly advantageous in low-light environments and in spectral regions (e.g., infrared, ultraviolet, or x-ray), where high-performance array detectors are often impractical or prohibitively expensive. However, traditional GI methods suffer from poor image reconstruction quality at low sampling rates and high hardware requirements; additionally, the generalization issues of data-driven deep learning methods limit their practical applications. Here, we propose a physics-driven Dual Untrained Ghost Imaging Neural Network (DUGIN). By integrating a “coarse-to-fine” dual-network architecture with the physical model, our method utilizes the deep image prior to achieve stable optimization and effectively escape local optima. Furthermore, a general affine scale correction module is designed to compensate for the intensity scale bias caused by normalization, further improving reconstruction fidelity. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that DUGIN achieves high-fidelity natural image reconstruction at a 5% sampling rate, showing significantly reduced image noise and clearer details compared to traditional differential ghost imaging and recent physics-driven Ghost Imaging using Deep Neural Network Constraint methods. This study provides a novel framework for GI technology and paves the way for its practical application.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lianjie Wen
Chengdu University of Information Technology
Weihang Zhang
Chengdu University of Information Technology
Jiachao Dai
Chengdu University of Information Technology
Applied Physics Letters
Chengdu University of Information Technology
Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c2fe4eeef8a2a6b12bc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0324916