This paper presents the Hormuz–Mirror Compact, a proposed regional durability framework linking Gulf security architecture and Palestinian justice architecture into a single self-reinforcing system. It argues that Middle Eastern instability persists because regional security fear and unresolved Palestinian grievance continuously reproduce one another. The Compact addresses this by coupling two engines: a Hormuz engine that contains power through maritime security, reciprocal sovereign guarantees, proxy transition, civilian nuclear-economic integration, and automatic consequence systems; and a Mirror engine that preserves dignity through Palestinian claim continuity, right-of-return preservation in legal form, strategic claims suspension, compensation mechanisms, diaspora parity, and development institutions. The framework is designed not as a trust-based peace process but as a trust-minimizing order in which disruption becomes self-punishing, cooperation continuously profitable, and justice institutionally preserved. The document positions the Compact as a regional anti-breakdown system rather than a sentimental peace formula, grounded in the principle that security makes justice politically survivable and justice makes security morally and regionally legitimate.
Matthew Dominik (Mon,) studied this question.