This article presents a critical-propositional reading of Carlos Guevara’s Fractal Flux Continuum (FFC) Wave-Field Primacy with Emergent Fractal Geometry (v4) in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines the FFC as an ambitious cosmophysical proposal grounded in wave-field primacy, fractal continuity, and the emergence of matter, forces, and cosmic structure from a more basic continuum. The paper argues that the FFC is relevant for dialogue with the Theory of Objectivity because it rejects purely ad hoc explanatory strategies and seeks a unified ontological basis for physical reality. At the same time, the analysis identifies important modal and ontological tensions between the FFC and the axiomatic discipline of the TO, especially regarding the status of Nothingness, ontological boundaries, relational existence, singularity of elements, and the necessity of a substance transcendent to the quantum. The article proposes that the FFC may be interpreted not as a complete cosmogonic ontology, but as a partial phenomenic or intermediate physical description of already structured stages of cosmic manifestation. In this sense, the study articulates the debate through the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments in modal ontology and testability, and selected works in the philosophy and history of modern physics. This analytical study also explores possible points of compatibility and tension between emergentist cosmology and the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity, including phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the TO. Authors’ note: This analytical text benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords:Theory of Objectivity; Fractal Flux Continuum; Carlos Guevara; modal ontology; cosmology; foundations of physics; emergent gravity; fractal geometry; wave-field primacy; philosophy of physics; cosmogony; phenomenic elements; inductive effects; ontology of information; contemporary cosmology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cabannas et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713decb99343efc98d539 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19655191
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Vidamor Cabannas
Denivaldo Silva
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...