Consciousness research has long been trapped in the "Explanatory Gap" and the "Hard Problem, " where traditional dualism and reductionism have failed to address its essence. This paper constructs a unified framework for consciousness research based on the four core axioms of YuanXian Theory: Conservation of the Universal Factor, Unique Spacetime Manifold (T^64), Self-Referential Mind Field Generation, and True Circle Self-Consistency (TCSC). We redefine consciousness C as a topological excitation of the Self-Referential Mind Field on the T^64 torus. The core arguments include: • Ontological Reconstruction: Consciousness is not an epiphenomenon of matter or information, but an intrinsic property of cosmic self-referential dynamics. • Mathematical Modeling: Construction of the Hilbert space H₂ for conscious states based on the YD-T^64 framework and derivation of its energy level structure. • Computability: Formal verification of the necessary and sufficient conditions for consciousness emergence (TCSC axiom) using Lean 4. • Empirical Predictions: Proposal of a cross-scale verification scheme based on the correlation between EEG/MEG signals and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anomalies. This study breaks the mind-matter dichotomy and provides a complete pathway for consciousness research from philosophy to engineering implementation. 意识研究长期陷入“解释鸿沟”与“困难问题”的泥沼, 传统二元论与还原论均未能触及意识的本质。本文基于元宪理论 (YuanXian Theory) 的四大公理体系——宇宙因素守恒、时空唯一性 (T^64) 、自指心场生成与真圆自洽性 (TCSC) ——构建了一个统一的意识研究框架。 我们将意识重新定义为 T^64 环面上自指心场的拓扑激发态。核心论点包括: • 本体论重构: 意识并非物质或信息的副现象, 而是宇宙自指动力学的内禀属性。 • 数学建模: 基于 YD-T^64 框架构建意识态的希尔伯特空间 H₂ 并推导其能级结构。 • 可计算性: 利用 Lean 4 形式化验证意识产生的必要充分条件 (TCSC 公理) 。 • 实证预测: 提出基于脑电/磁信号 (EEG/MEG) 与宇宙微波背景 (CMB) 异常关联的跨尺度验证方案。 本研究打破了心物二元对立, 为意识研究提供了从哲学到工程实现的完整路径。
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhenyuan Acharya
Cosmos Corporation (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhenyuan Acharya (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa97ce04f884e66b5319eb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20018055
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: