Abstract Accurate cancer subtyping with accompanying molecular characterization is critical for precision oncology. While machine learning approaches have been applied to both digital pathology and cancer genomics, previous work has been limited in sample size and has typically aggregated granular cancer subtypes into coarse groupings, likely obfuscating informative molecular and prognostic associations and phenotypic variation of more detailed tumor subtypes. Accordingly, we collated 378,123 hematoxylin and eosin (H ii) identify unsupervised sub-clusters of tumors with genomic determinants of tumor phenotype; iii) specify granular diagnoses for cancers of unknown primary, evaluated by genomic associations and expected clinical outcome distributions; iv) annotate functional significance for variants of uncertain significance (VUS); and v) identify cases that mimic the phenotypic effect of known DNA variants on H&E in the absence of detectable DNA alterations. Taken together, this work advances our understanding of phenotypic variation of granular tumor subtypes, their relevance to enhanced diagnostics, and their potential utility in risk stratification with multimodal machine learning in cancer.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Boehm et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4546ad7bf08b1ead2f79 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.14.670351
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Kevin M. Boehm
Madison Darmofal
Arfath Pasha
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...