Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
“Are we asking the right questions?” seems cliché, but for ChatGPT, it is a pivotal tool to ensure the accuracy of responses. While ChatGPT-3.5’s training on the vast database promises to revolutionize STEM education and research, this investigation shows the importance of precise communication and prompt engineering in guiding ChatGPT-3.5 toward reliable and accurate responses, particularly in chemistry. For instance, emphasizing context, clearly defining symbols, and focusing on field-specific instructions can dramatically improve its performance. Furthermore, avoiding open-ended prompts and strategically using repetition can further enhance its accuracy. The iterative prompt design, demonstrated through a series of adjustments, illustrates how seemingly minor refinements, such as substituting “least” for “lowest”, profoundly impact the output. This study highlights the essential role of human oversight, including the construction of well-crafted prompts, in guarding reliable information and nurturing a productive “Human–AI” (HAI) partnership.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dinesh V. Vidhani
Manoharan Mariappan
Chemistry
Florida College
Miami Dade College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vidhani et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5cb66b6db643587561d4f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6040043
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: