Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy characterized by rapid growth and early metastasis and is susceptible to treatment resistance and recurrence. Understanding the intra‐tumoral spatial heterogeneity in SCLC is crucial for improving patient outcomes and clinically relevant subtyping. In this study, a spatial whole transcriptome‐wide analysis of 25 SCLC patients at sub‐histological resolution using GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling technology is performed. This analysis deciphered intra‐tumoral multi‐regional heterogeneity, characterized by distinct molecular profiles, biological functions, immune features, and molecular subtypes within spatially localized histological regions. Connections between different transcript‐defined intra‐tumoral phenotypes and their impact on patient survival and therapeutic response are also established. Finally, a gene signature, termed ITHtyper, based on the prevalence of intra‐tumoral heterogeneity levels, which enables patient risk stratification from bulk RNA‐seq profiles is identified. The prognostic value of ITHtyper is rigorously validated in independent multicenter patient cohorts. This study introduces a preliminary tumor‐centric, regionally targeted spatial transcriptome resource that sheds light on previously unexplored intra‐tumoral spatial heterogeneity in SCLC. These findings hold promise to improve tumor reclassification and facilitate the development of personalized treatments for SCLC patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zicheng Zhang
Xujie Sun
Yutao Liu
Advanced Science
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Wenzhou Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64178b6db6435875d2986 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202402716
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: