Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
You have accessJournal of UrologyImaging/Uroradiology I (MP18)1 May 2024MP18-18 IMPACT OF 18F-DCFPYL PSMA PET ON ACCURACY of MPMRI IN MEN WITH LOW AND INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A PHASE II DIAGNOSTIC TRIAL Marcelo Bigarella, Edward Lawrence, Abigail Wiedmer, Jenna Cava, Tudor Borza, Igor Bereslavskyy, Shane Wells, Steve Cho, and David Jarrard Marcelo BigarellaMarcelo Bigarella , Edward LawrenceEdward Lawrence , Abigail WiedmerAbigail Wiedmer , Jenna CavaJenna Cava , Tudor BorzaTudor Borza , Igor BereslavskyyIgor Bereslavskyy , Shane WellsShane Wells , Steve ChoSteve Cho , and David JarrardDavid Jarrard View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008672.83391.ed.18AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Next generation PSMA PET imaging is shifting the landscape of prostate cancer (PC), particularly in the setting of initial staging of high-risk patients and recurrence. To evaluate its clinical accuracy in men with low and intermediate risk PC followed on active surveillance (AS) we undertook a prospective trial. METHODS: This IRB-approved prospective Phase II trial tests the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET with mpMRI on a dedicated PET/MRI scanner (GE Healthcare) and systemic and targeted MRI/TRUS prostate biopsy performed. Planned accrual: 100 men on AS and primary outcome is the detection of clinically significant PC (GG/ISUP ≥2). Blinded GU radiologists interpreted PET (5-point visual Likert scale) and MRI (PI-RADS v2.1) independently. PET SUVmax was obtained for all PIRADS and Likert lesions ≥3. Standard of care MRI PI-RADS ≥3 and research PET Likert ≥3 lesions were biopsied. Per lesion and per patient analyses were performed. RESULTS: At this interim analysis, 39 patients completed the entire study protocol. Patients had been followed on AS for 23 mo (12-47), and most (67%) had low-risk disease. 81 PIRADS ≥3 lesions were identified on MRI(∼2.1/pt), mean size 11(8-15)mm and 71 Likert ≥3 lesions on PET(∼1.8/pt) mean SUVmax 4.4(3.3-6.1). Total lesions for analysis were 107. On study biopsy csPC was found in 16/39(41%) men and 18/107(16.8%) of the targeted lesions. SUVmax of csPC increased with GG (GG2, 3, and 5 were 4.2, 8.8, and 11.1, respectively). The NPV, specificity and accuracy of mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥3) for csPC was 92%, 27%, 37% respectively and with the addition of PET improved to 95%, 66% and 69% (Table 1) The addition of PET PSMA detected csPC in 2/16 patients (13%) (GG2, GG3), who would have otherwise continued AS based solely on MRI-targeted biopsies. Avoiding biopsy of PI-RADS ≤3, Likert ≤3 lesions would have not missed csPC and saved 4/39(10%) of the patients and 30/107 (28%) lesions from biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In this interim analysis, the addition of PSMA PET to prostate mpMRI improved the accuracy for csPC detection in men on AS. Imaging and clinical predictive models including PSMA PET with mpMRI may identify men who could safely avoid prostate biopsy and coincident morbidity, as well increasing the detection rates of csPC missed by MRI-biopsy alone. Source of Funding: Bluemke Family Fund © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e308 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Marcelo Bigarella More articles by this author Edward Lawrence More articles by this author Abigail Wiedmer More articles by this author Jenna Cava More articles by this author Tudor Borza More articles by this author Igor Bereslavskyy More articles by this author Shane Wells More articles by this author Steve Cho More articles by this author David Jarrard More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marcelo Bigarella
Edward R. Lawrence
Abigail M. Wiedmer
The Journal of Urology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bigarella et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f2aab6db64358766d718 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0001008672.83391.ed.18