Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BackgroundThe prognostic significance of tumor size with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) patients has not yet been thoroughly evaluated. Our objective was to investigate the influence of tumor size on prognostic value in adult ACC patients.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER) was employed to identify adult ACC patients who had been diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. The "X-Tile" program determined the optimal cutoff value of tumor size. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survive (OS) were estimated. The survival outcomes and risk factors were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier methods and the multivariable cox regression respectively.ResultsA total 426 adult ACC patients were included. Univariable and multivariable cox analysis revealed age, larger tumor size and metastasis as consistent predictors of lower CSS and OS. The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was identified as 8.5 cm using X-tile software, and Kaplan-Meier method showed dramatic prognostic difference between patients with larger tumors (>8.5 cm) and smaller tumors (≤8.5 cm) (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed no statistical significance and a consistent proportionate effect of tumor size on CSS and OS across all eight pre-specified subgroups. Interestingly, an additional subgroup analysis showed that ACC patients could not benefit from chemotherapy in terms of CSS and OS.ConclusionThe study suggests that tumor size is a crucial prognostic factor in ACC patients and a cutoff value 8.5 cm might indicate a poor outcome. Given the limitations of the available data, it is challenging to conclusively determine the benefit of chemotherapy in adult ACC patients across different tumor size ranges.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yi Huang
Libo Liu
Qinghua Gan
Heliyon
Sun Yat-sen University
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital
National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Huang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72cd9b6db6435876a6546 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28160
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: