Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Current and future developments in artificial intelligence (AI) systems have the capacity to revolutionize the research process for better or worse. On the one hand, AI systems can serve as collaborators as they help streamline and conduct our research. On the other hand, such systems can also become our adversaries when they impoverish our ability to learn as theorists, or when they lead us astray through inaccurate, biased, or fake information. No matter which angle is considered, and whether we like it or not, AI systems are here to stay. In this curated discussion, we raise questions about human centrality and agency in the research process, and about the multiple philosophical and practical challenges we are facing now and ones we will face in the future.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mukta Kulkarni
Saku Mantere
Eero Vaara
Journal of Management Inquiry
University of Oxford
University of Pennsylvania
University of Cambridge
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kulkarni et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77f57b6db6435876f340f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231219622
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: