ABSTRACT This article examines the ethical implications of utilizing generative AI (GenAI) tools in adult higher education. It clarifies how traditional AI applications, such as plagiarism detection and adaptive quizzes, differ from generative systems that create new content. Core tensions include protecting student data, mitigating algorithmic bias, preserving academic integrity and authenticity, and ensuring fair access for all learners. The authors explore the risks of over‐reliance on AI, alongside strategies for responsible integration, including clear usage policies, transparency, and addressing bias and privacy issues. The article presents practical ethical frameworks to help faculty uphold professional standards, foster a culture of integrity, and guide students in developing critical AI literacy through critical reflection, co‐created guidelines, and hands‐on decision‐making exercises.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jacqueline McGinty
Kayon Murray-Johnson
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education
University of Rhode Island
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
McGinty et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/694025972d562116f28febb3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.70012
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: