Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
SUMMARY The common approach to the multiplicity problem calls for controlling the familywise error rate (FWER). This approach, though, has faults, and we point out a few. A different approach to problems of multiple significance testing is presented. It calls for controlling the expected proportion of falsely rejected hypotheses — the false discovery rate. This error rate is equivalent to the FWER when all hypotheses are true but is smaller otherwise. Therefore, in problems where the control of the false discovery rate rather than that of the FWER is desired, there is potential for a gain in power. A simple sequential Bonferronitype procedure is proved to control the false discovery rate for independent test statistics, and a simulation study shows that the gain in power is substantial. The use of the new procedure and the appropriateness of the criterion are illustrated with examples.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Benjamini et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6941e3710d7f3d181b49b57f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Yoav Benjamini
Yosef Hochberg
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)
Tel Aviv University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: