Abstract Aims: With the advent of new antibody-drug conjugates, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low expression is a new therapeutic category for breast cancer. However, the prognostic differences between categories corresponding to 1+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 2+ on IHC with no amplification by ISH have not been sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of different HER2 expression levels in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, premenopausal breast cancer. Methods: Using data from our institutional database from 2008 to 2017, we enrolled hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, non-metastatic premenopausal breast cancer patients with pathological N0-1 disease treated with curative surgery. Hormone receptor-positive was defined as either estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive. ER and PR were considered positive if the IHC staining was positive in more than 1% of tumor cells. A HER2-negative result corresponded to a score of 0, 1+ on IHC, or 2+ on IHC with no amplification by ISH. We divided enrolled patients into three groups according to their HER2 expression levels: patients with HER2-zero (Group 1), HER2-1+ (Group 2), and HER2-2+ with no amplification by ISH (Group 3). Distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) among the 3 groups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival estimates were compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazards model with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the independent prognostic effects of each variable on DRFS. Results: The median age was 45 years. Among 1011 patients enrolled, 269 patients (26.6%) had pN1 disease, 318 (31.5%) had pT2 disease, 193 (19.1%) had histological grade 3 disease. Group 1, 2, and 3 had 415 (41.1%), 465 (46.0%), and 129 (12.8%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up time after surgery was 8.2 years. During the follow-up period, 23 patients died from breast cancer, 7 patients died from causes other than breast cancer, and 58 patients had distant metastases. There were no differences in adjuvant treatment among the 3 groups, with mastectomy, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy (ET), and radiotherapy given to approximately 40%, 30%, 90%, and 60%, respectively. The duration of ET more than 5 years was given to approximately 50%. Patients in Group 3 had significantly worse DRFS than patients with Group 1 and 2 (8y-DRFS, 89.8% vs. 95.6%, P=0.0042, 89.8% vs. 94.9%, P=0.0048, respectively).Multivariable analysis revealed that the significant risk factors associated with worse DRFS were pT2 disease (HR 2.67; 95% CI 1.46-4.88; P=0.001), pN1 disease (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.76-6.86; P0.001), and HER2-2+ with no amplification by ISH (HR 3.26; 95% CI 1.61-6.61; P=0.001). HER2-1+ was not associated with worse DRFS (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.64-2.16; P=0.587). The duration of ET more than 5 years was significantly associated with favorable DRFS (HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.06-0.23; P0.001). Conclusions: The results from this single institutional database study suggested that HER2-2+ with no amplification by ISH may be one of the poor prognostic factors in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, non-metastatic premenopausal breast cancer patients with pathological N0- 1 disease. Patients with HER2-2+ with no amplification by ISH may require a different treatment strategy than patients with HER2-zero and HER2-1+. Further evaluation in a larger cohort is needed. Citation Format: T. Murata, T. Shimoi, A. Saito, M. Onishi, M. Yoshida, N. Ogi, M. Chen, A. Ogawa, A. Nakashoji, H. Maeda, C. Watase, K. Sudo, K. Yonemori, S. Takayama. Prognostic impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression level in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, non-metastatic premenopausal breast cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-09-16.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
T. Murata
T. Shimoi
Atsushi Saito
Clinical Cancer Research
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Tokyo National Hospital
National Cancer Centre Japan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Murata et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a84cecb39a600b3eee65 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-09-16
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: