Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by anthracycline and cyclophosphamide has become the standard of care for stage II-III early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, clinicopathological features and outcomes of metastatic relapse after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy remain poorly documented. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis at Institut Curie Hospitals (France) including patients diagnosed with a metastatic relapse between Nomvember 2022 and May 2025, after having received pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant regimen for early TNBC. Patients’ characteristics at early and metastatic settings were collected, as well as Distant Metastasis-Free Interval (DMFI, from primary diagnosis to metastatic relapse), Progression-Free Survival on 1st line therapy (PFS1, from the date of metastatic relapse) and Overall Survival (OS, from the date of metastatic relapse). Results: We identified N=32 patients out of 386 patients treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab who experienced metastatic relapse following a pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant regimen. At primary diagnosis, all 32 tumors were TNBC, including N=3 tumors (9%) with low (1-9%) expression of hormone receptors and N=13 tumors (41%) with HER2low status. Strikingly, androgen receptor (AR) expression was apparently enriched, with N=8/22 (36%) primary tumors showing high (≥10%) AR expression. Most primary tumors were of grade 3 (N=25/32, 78%) and stage II (N=20, 63%). Only N=2/29 (7%) patients displayed a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, N=30 patients underwent surgery, of whom only N=5 patients (17%) had a pCR (RCB=0). Post-operative treatments were heterogeneous: N=11 patients (37%) received adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy, N=9 (30%) received capecitabine monotherapy, N=5 (17%) received a combination of both, N=3 (10%) were included in a clinical trial while N=2 (7%) relapsed before any adjuvant therapy. The median DMFI from initial diagnosis was 16 months, IQR9-19, and most relapses (N=23, 72%) occurred during or within 6 months after the completion of adjuvant therapy. At relapse, median age was 43 years (IQR37-50). Visceral metastases were present in N=22 patients (69%), while brain and bone-only metastases were identified in N=6 (19%) and N=3 (9.4%) patients, respectively. A prior or concurrent local recurrence was observed in N=12 of patients (38%). Although N=13/24 tumors (54%) displayed a high PD-L1 CPS score, only 3 patients (9%) were rechallenged with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy as first line therapy. N=11 patients (34%) received standard chemotherapy, N=16 patients (50%) received sacitumab govitecan (SG) when olaparib and experimental therapy were each administered to N=1 patient (3%). After a median follow-up of 11.2 months, median PFS1 was 3.9 months 95%CI:2.4-5.5. We found no prognostic impact of disease sites and no survival difference between standard chemotherapy (median PFS1: 3.7mo) and SG (4.1mo). N=15 deaths have been observed, with a median OS of 8.5 months 95%CI: 7.7-NA. Updated results with longer follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: This real-world cohort of patients with TNBC relapsing after pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy shows an extremely poor prognosis upon metastatic recurrence, regardless of metastatic site and first line therapy. There remains a critical need to improve treatment strategies in this population. Citation Format: R. Kabirian, M. Gendreau, F. C. Bidard, F. Lerebours, A. Vincent Salomon, L. Djerroudi, P. H. Cottu, F. Coussy, J. Y. Pierga, L. Cabel, D. Loirat. Clinicopathological features and outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer relapsing after pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-03-18.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rayan Kabirian
M. Gendreau
F. C. Bidard
Clinical Cancer Research
Institut Curie
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kabirian et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e0e482488d673cd46a6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-03-18