Recovery rate exhibits significant nonlinear decline under cognitive overload conditions exceeding working memory capacity with subjective task meaning moderating this effect.
Does autonomic recovery rate decline nonlinearly when cognitive load exceeds working memory capacity, and is this moderated by subjective task meaning?
Target N=60 participants. Key exclusions: cardiovascular pathology/conditions, psychoactive medication, sleep deprivation (<6h), acute illness, and caffeine within 6h prior.
Cognitive Load (P) at 5 task difficulty levels (low, moderate, high, overload, extreme overload) with subjective task meaning (M) assessment.
Within-subject comparison across different cognitive load levels (e.g., load ≤ working memory capacity vs. load > working memory capacity).
Autonomic recovery rate (RR) measured through HRV (RR_HRV) and GSR (RR_GSR) over a standardized 5-7 minute recovery period.surrogate
This preregistered protocol outlines a framework to test whether human autonomic recovery exhibits nonlinear threshold behavior under cognitive overload and if subjective meaning modulates this effect.
This work presents the consolidated evolutionary version of Metabolic Adaptive Dynamics (MAD), a physiologically operationalized framework for modeling human adaptive regulation under cognitive load. The core model defines adaptive capacity as the measurable rate of autonomic recovery (RR) following cognitive perturbation, operationalized through: Cognitive Load (P), measured via task complexity and NASA-TLX Working Memory Capacity (V), measured via Operation Span Autonomic Recovery (RR), measured through HRV (RMSSD) and GSR The initial proportional formulation (RR ∝ V/P) is extended in this version by introducing: Nonlinear overload dynamics (quadratic and threshold modeling under P > V) Collapse criteria (including stress inertia defined as RR < 0) Motivational moderation (M) as a subjective task-meaning variable Recovery Debt (RD) as a cumulative feedback mechanism MAD v1.2 is presented as a falsifiable research program and preregistered empirical proposal. The document specifies operational definitions, statistical models, and threshold criteria for laboratory validation. No ontological claims are made; the framework remains strictly operational and testable.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dead Elvis (Sun,) conducted a other in Healthy adults tested for cognitive overload effects with no cardiovascular pathology and no psychoactive medication (n=60). Cognitive load levels (P) with personalized overload threshold based on working memory capacity (V) vs. Within-subject comparisons of task difficulty levels was evaluated on Recovery rate (RR) decline under cognitive overload (P > V) measured by heart rate variability (RR_HRV) and galvanic skin response recovery (RR_GSR) (Significant quadratic term for P indicating nonlinear recovery decline). Recovery rate exhibits significant nonlinear decline under cognitive overload conditions exceeding working memory capacity with subjective task meaning moderating this effect.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fb3de8e28729cf6464f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18734344
Dead Elvis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...