Abstract This multi-cohort study evaluates whether dual immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab and ipilimumab in parallel or sequentially, or triplet chemotherapy with nivolumab can enhance efficacy as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients are randomized 1:1 to Arm A (mFOLFOX + nivolumab 240 mg every two weeks + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every six weeks in parallel or Arm B (mFOLFOX). Subsequently, patients are randomized 1:2 to Arm A1 (identical to Arm A) or Arm A2 (three cycles of mFOLFOX followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab). In Arm C all patients receive FLOT + nivolumab. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival and objective response rate. Median progression-free survival (months) is: Arm A/A1, 5.8; Arm A2, 4.0; Arm B, 6.6 and Arm C, 7.0.Toxicity is manageable across all arms, with higher rates in arms receiving dual checkpoint inhibition. Here we show that chemotherapy with dual checkpoint inhibition in parallel increases toxicity without improving efficacy, while FOLFOX followed by immunotherapy is insufficient. FLOT with nivolumab appears feasible and shows promising efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03647969
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sylvie Lorenzen
Thorsten Oliver Goetze
Peter C. Thuss-Patience
Nature Communications
Heidelberg University
Technical University of Munich
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lorenzen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a288590a974eb0d3c042f0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69622-7