This study focuses on the Shahe River Basin, a data-sparse, mountainous watershed located in Hebei Province, China, where accurate precipitation estimation is challenging. Generating high-quality precipitation data in complex terrain is a critical challenge. This study proposes and systematically validates a novel, three-stage hybrid fusion framework. The framework is designed to determine the optimal merging strategy by comparing two distinct paradigms: "Correct-then-Combine" versus "Combine-then-Correct". The core of the framework synergistically integrates Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) for correcting spatially structured biases and the Bayesian Three-Cornered Hat (BTCH) method for minimizing random errors. We systematically evaluated four different fusion pathways (MGWR-BTCH, BTCH-MGWR, MGWR-EA, EA-MGWR) to identify the superior architecture. Furthermore, to isolate the specific contribution of the multi-scale regression strategy and ensure robustness under sparse gauge coverage, we conducted rigorous benchmarking against standard Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and a Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV). The comprehensive performance of the resulting products was then assessed using a dual-level validation framework, encompassing both direct statistical metrics and hydrological simulations with the GXAJ-DAR model. The "Correct-then-Combine" pathway, embodied by the MGWR-BTCH product, was demonstrated to be the optimal framework. This product significantly outperformed simpler fusion products (e.g., reducing RMSE by 54% compared to a single-stage BTCH product) and consistently, albeit incrementally, surpassed other advanced pathways in precipitation metrics (BIAS = 0.04 mm/day, R = 0.83). Crucially, this seemingly modest statistical edge was amplified into a highly significant improvement in hydrological utility. When driving the GXAJ-DAR model, the MGWR-BTCH product yielded an excellent streamflow simulation (hourly NSE = 0.91), drastically reducing the peak discharge error from −29.7% to a mere −3.87%. This study validates that an optimized fusion architecture is key to producing hydrologically superior precipitation data, providing a robust solution for water resource management in the Shahe Basin and similar data-scarce mountainous regions. • A novel three-stage framework evaluates precipitation fusion architectures systematically. • The "Correct-then-Combine" paradigm is proven as the optimal fusion architecture. • Synergy is key: MGWR corrects spatial biases, while BTCH minimizes random errors. • Minor metric gains amplify to major hydrological improvements (NSE 0.52–0.91). • A 1-km, hourly dataset is proven highly effective for a data-scarce mountain basin.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zijian Zhao
Ke Zhang
Xuejun Yi
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hohai University
China Meteorological Administration
Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhao et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3aaa802a1e69014ccb6fa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103319