Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schneider et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d732878e958094d1b8a39e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210x12493538729793
Carsten Q. Schneider
Claudius Wagemann
Comparative Sociology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: