Abstract How does technological change affect social policy preferences? We advance this lively debate by focusing on the role of dual vocational education and training (VET). Existing literature would lead us to expect that dual VET increases demand for compensatory social policy and magnifies the effect of automation risk on such demands. In contrast, we contend that dual VET weakens demand for compensatory social policy through three non-mutually exclusive mechanisms that we refer to as (i) material self-interest; (ii) workplace socialization; and (iii) skill certification. We further hypothesize that dual VET mitigates the association between automation risk and social policy preferences. Analyzing cross-national individual data from the European Social Survey and national-level data on education systems, we find strong evidence for our argument. The paper advances the debate on social policy preferences in the age of automation and sheds new light on the relationship between skill formation and social policy preferences.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haslberger et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ec6c1944d70ce05d52 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123426101446
Matthias Haslberger
Patrick Emmenegger
Niccolò Durazzi
British Journal of Political Science
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
University of St.Gallen
University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...