This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most adopted 3D surveying techniques in Cultural Heritage, offering practical guidance for the selection of appropriate methods when three-dimensional documentation of artworks is required. The analysis focuses on the most effective technologies for the 3D documentation of sites and objects of artistic value, with selection criteria primarily centred on non-invasiveness, given the uniqueness and cultural significance of the case studies, and the instrument flexibility, a crucial requirement for non-transportable items. A broad spectrum of 3D techniques is currently available for the multiscale diagnostic investigation of artworks, providing information at both macroscopic and microscopic levels. This review reports on the state of the art of such systems and evaluates the main characteristics of each technology in relation to its applicability in the heritage field. Particular attention is given to highlighting advantages and limitations, and to assessing performance in terms of resolution, gauge volume/area, acquisition time, and cost. In addition, the review discusses exemplary cases in which 3D methods are integrated with other analytical techniques to enable a more comprehensive understanding of the object under investigation. Finally, recent studies are examined to identify the most suitable approaches and the specific requirements for the digitization of real-world heritage assets.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emma Vannini
Alice Dal Fovo
Raffaella Fontana
Sensors
University of Florence
National Research Council
University of Verona
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vannini et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896406c1944d70ce07968 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082297
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: