Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper offers an active inference account of choice behaviour and learning. It focuses on the distinction between goal-directed and habitual behaviour and how they contextualise each other. We show that habits emerge naturally (and autodidactically) from sequential policy optimisation when agents are equipped with state-action policies. In active inference, behaviour has explorative (epistemic) and exploitative (pragmatic) aspects that are sensitive to ambiguity and risk respectively, where epistemic (ambiguity-resolving) behaviour enables pragmatic (reward-seeking) behaviour and the subsequent emergence of habits. Although goal-directed and habitual policies are usually associated with model-based and model-free schemes, we find the more important distinction is between belief-free and belief-based schemes. The underlying (variational) belief updating provides a comprehensive (if metaphorical) process theory for several phenomena, including the transfer of dopamine responses, reversal learning, habit formation and devaluation. Finally, we show that active inference reduces to a classical (Bellman) scheme, in the absence of ambiguity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Friston et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbc02250e1971baba3c70e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.022
Karl Friston
Thomas H. B. FitzGerald
Francesco Rigoli
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
University College London
California Institute of Technology
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...