Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Many different machine learning algorithms exist; taking into account each algorithm's hyperparameters, there is a staggeringly large number of possible alternatives overall. We consider the problem of simultaneously selecting a learning algorithm and setting its hyperparameters, going beyond previous work that attacks these issues separately. We show that this problem can be addressed by a fully automated approach, leveraging recent innovations in Bayesian optimization. Specifically, we consider a wide range of feature selection techniques (combining 3 search and 8 evaluator methods) and all classification approaches implemented in WEKA's standard distribution, spanning 2 ensemble methods, 10 meta-methods, 27 base classifiers, and hyperparameter settings for each classifier. On each of 21 popular datasets from the UCI repository, the KDD Cup 09, variants of the MNIST dataset and CIFAR-10, we show classification performance often much better than using standard selection and hyperparameter optimization methods. We hope that our approach will help non-expert users to more effectively identify machine learning algorithms and hyperparameter settings appropriate to their applications, and hence to achieve improved performance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chris Thornton
Frank Hutter
Holger H. Hoos
University of British Columbia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thornton et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbc9e1f7e0c66ced836520 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487629
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: