Background/Objectives: To evaluate the influence of different DIXON contrasts on the quality of subtraction images in dynamic breast MRI using maximum intensity projections (MIPs). Methods: This retrospective study included n = 40 women (median age: 53.5 years, range 23–83) undergoing clinically indicated breast MRI (3T). For each MRI examination, two independent readers individually evaluated GBCA-enhanced subtraction MIPS for different timepoints (n = 5) and DIXON contrasts (n = 4) per breast, resulting in a total of 800 individual evaluations. Evaluations comprised (a) qualitative measures, using Likert-scores for artefact strength, breast parenchyma visibility, lesion visibility and reading confidence; and (b) signal intensity, measured in three regions of interest with the apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR) and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR) calculated. The evaluation results were analysed to identify differences between DIXON contrasts. Results: The “only water” DIXON contrast at ~120s after GBCA injection achieved the highest lesion conspicuity and reading confidence scores and lowest artefact scores; however, its performance was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) compared to the “in-phase” and “opposed-phase” subtractions. The aCNR at the second timepoint was slightly, but not significantly (p > 0.05), lower than the first timepoint, whilst aSNR increased significantly from the first to second timepoint in all contrasts. Conclusions: Subtraction MIPs derived from the “only water” DIXON contrast achieved the highest qualitative scoring for lesion conspicuity and confidence, with the aSNR increasing and aCNR decreasing between the first and second timepoints.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christian et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b49e4eeef8a2a6b048d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16081145
Shirley-Maria Christian
Sebastian Bickelhaupt
Dominique Hadler
Diagnostics
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Klinikum Darmstadt
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...