Epidemiological Management of Preeclampsia–Eclampsia Cases in the Intensive Care Unit Before and During the Health Crisis

Health crises hinder the provision of intensive care for critical obstetric conditions such as preeclampsia and eclampsia, where timely decision making and system capacity directly impact maternal and fetal outcomes. This study compared the clinical and epidemiological profile and care processes in the ICU for cases of preeclampsia and eclampsia before and during the COVID-19 health crisis in Alto Amazonas, Loreto (Peru), using a comparative mixed-method approach. Quantitative data were obtained from ICU medical records for two periods (2015–2019 and 2020–2022). Categorical variables were compared using exact methods (Fisher’s exact test for 2 × 2 tables and exact procedures for scatter tables with multiple categories), and continuous variables were compared using nonparametric tests where appropriate. The most notable change was an increase in the frequency of cesarean sections during the health crisis, which should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and potential changes in admission criteria and system limitations. Other clinical indicators and discharge status showed no clear evidence of substantial differences between the periods. Qualitative findings highlighted systemic limitations affecting continuity of care, particularly those related to timely access to safe blood products and referral pathways. These results align with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and support strengthening preparedness, referral coordination, and the availability of essential resources to protect maternal health during large-scale emergencies.