This paper develops Multilectic Meta-Logic, a layered framework for reasoning across increasing degrees of emergence, contradiction, mediation, recursive interdependence, and integrative coordination. Rather than assuming that one logical form governs all domains equally, the framework proposes that different structural conditions call forth different modes of logical organization. Five principal regimes are distinguished: chaolectics, concerning instability, nonlinear emergence, and weak closure; dialectics, concerning structured opposition and partial transformative closure; trialectics, introducing constitutive thirdness and mediational closure beyond binary contradiction; hololectics, concerning recursive part-whole interdependence and systemic closure; and omnilectics, concerning the meta-integrative coordination of multiple logical regimes. These levels are treated not as isolated inventions, but as an ordered hierarchy of increasing relational depth and closure scope. The paper further argues that this hierarchy may be interpreted as an ontology of logical closure, in which each lectical regime corresponds to a distinct mode by which reasoning stabilizes intelligibility under differing structural demands. Multilectic Meta-Logic is therefore proposed not as one more isolated logical system, but as a metaframework for situating multiple logical forms within a graded architecture of reasoning. The present paper is confined to the foundational articulation of this framework; later applications to ontology, physics, systems theory, cognition, and civilization are reserved for separate work. Keywords Multilectic Meta-Logic; chaolectics; dialectics; trialectics; hololectics; omnilectics; logical closure; layered reasoning; emergence; systems logic; meta-logic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Philip Lilien
University Foundation
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Philip Lilien (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2ba0e4eeef8a2a6b08d0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19547236
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: