"This proposal creates a biometric and creative anti-scraping right that does not depend on building anew surveillance database. Instead, it changes the legal architecture around mass data collection bygiving people a way to designate certain information as protected and by imposing a rebuttablepresumption against corporations that later process that information without lawful basis.Its purpose is simple: stop making individuals prove hidden extraction by powerful institutions.Make those institutions prove they did not unlawfully take what was never theirs to take.And for creators, it offers a narrower but practical protection: not necessarily full control over everyuse, but a clear right to say, you may not scrape this into the machine."
mark williamson (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: