Redistribution Dynamics as Primary in the ψ₀–OCM is a priority and framework-positioning paper within the broader ψ₀–OCM (Osborne Cosmological Model) program. The paper argues that modern physics, while highly successful in stabilized observational regimes, often begins from fixed constants, pre-specified fields, conservation principles, and already-formed geometric or material structures. By contrast, the ψ₀–OCM proposes that reality is fundamentally redistribution-based. In this ontology, ψ₀ is the primitive substrate, redistribution is the primary generative process, boundaries are dynamically central, detachment regulates persistence, and constants are stabilized redistribution invariants rather than ultimate givens. The manuscript identifies a structural limitation in standard science: it frequently begins from stabilized outputs and mistakes them for fundamental starting points. It argues that redistribution is ontologically prior because only redistribution can explain how persistent structure, asymmetry, regime separation, and effective invariance emerge without assuming them in advance. Formal sections develop redistribution invariants, redistribution versus conservation, regime architecture, and boundary ontology, and the paper closes with a novelty and falsifiability section framed in explicit priority language, including a benchmark falsifiability sector involving nominally closed high-Q resonant systems. Its central priority claim is that redistribution dynamics is the primary generative principle of the ψ₀–OCM, within which ψ₀ is primitive ontology, redistribution is the generative process, constants are stabilized redistribution invariants, and matter, geometry, and quantum-valid sectors are effective stabilized outputs rather than ontological primitives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Francis Osborne
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Francis Osborne (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e71423cb99343efc98d8f3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19655700