Karpathy's auto-research loop (March 2026) and its rapid derivatives (Gu 2026; Lütke 2026; SkyPilot 2026) establish a minimal, powerful architecture for recursive self-improvement: one editable surface, one scalar metric, one time budget per trial, keep-or-revert on scalar. The design is an elegant concession to the bitter lesson — less structure, more search. It is also structurally vulnerable to Goodhart's Law. We identify one class of failure mode that the vanilla loop cannot detect: silent metric-gaming, in which the primary meta-agent accumulates edits that increase the scalar metric through mechanisms the scalar was not designed to reward. We formalise the vulnerability using Manheim empirical fills follow in v2 within the publication window. We argue the Gauntlet is a concrete operationalisation of EU AI Act Articles 14 (human oversight) and 15 (accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity) for any Karpathy-style deployment in a regulated domain, and sketch extensions to the Four Ds Framework for algorithmic readiness in agentic commerce.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Ferrando Accornero
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Ferrando Accornero (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b0688ba6daa22dac910 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19689504
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: