Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Problem 3 of the Complex Numeric Representational System (CNRS) programme asks whether addition and multiplication of CNRS digit strings — that is, digit strings in base −2 + i with digit alphabet 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 — are computable by finite automata. This is the difference between having a representational system and having an arithmetic system. Problem 3 is now complete. CNRS-A is the Layer 1 arithmetic system of the three-layer CNRS architecture 8: single-valued complex number representations (Layer 1), extended element encoding for multivalued operations (Layer 2), and the hybrid progressive place-value system CNRS-H for differentiation-as-digit-shift (Layer 3). The complete results of this paper are: (1) Base −2 + i with digit alphabet 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 has the finiteness property (F) (Akiyama–Rao–Steiner criterion, verified explicitly). (2) The exact reachable addition carry set has |K| = 14 elements (determined by exhaustive breadth-first search) ; the addition transducer has exactly 14 states and 350 transitions. (3) Multiplication followsthe Cauchy convolution law (X · Y) k = Pn+m=k dnem; the value map is a ring homomorphism. (4) A two-phase normalisation algorithm (convolution followed by carry-reduction) brings all coefficients back into the digit alphabet; termination is guaranteed by the (F) property. (5) One-argument multiplication (fixed J-digit multiplier c) is computable by a single-pass finite transducer with |Kc| · 5J−1 states, where Kc is the multiplier-specific carry set. For c = 2 (the minimal non-trivial case): |K2| = 14, giving 14 states and 70 transitions. (6) Two-argument online multiplication inherently requires two passes (proved by pigeonhole on the state space) ; sequential single-pass is possible when one argument is known first.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Donald G. Palmer
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Donald G. Palmer (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8dfe7dec685947ab686 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20173197
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: