Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Although large language models often produce impressive outputs, it remains unclear how they perform in real-world scenarios requiring strong reasoning skills and expert domain knowledge. We set out to investigate whether closed- and open-source models (GPT-3.5, Llama 2, etc.) can be applied to answer and reason about difficult real-world-based questions. We focus on three popular medical benchmarks (MedQA-US Medical Licensing Examination USMLE, MedMCQA, and PubMedQA) and multiple prompting scenarios: chain of thought (CoT; think step by step), few shot, and retrieval augmentation. Based on an expert annotation of the generated CoTs, we found that InstructGPT can often read, reason, and recall expert knowledge. Last, by leveraging advances in prompt engineering (few-shot and ensemble methods), we demonstrated that GPT-3.5 not only yields calibrated predictive distributions but also reaches the passing score on three datasets: MedQA-USMLE (60.2%), MedMCQA (62.7%), and PubMedQA (78.2%). Open-source models are closing the gap: Llama 2 70B also passed the MedQA-USMLE with 62.5% accuracy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Valentin Liévin
Christoffer Hother
Andreas Geert Motzfeldt
Patterns
University of Copenhagen
Technical University of Denmark
Rigshospitalet
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liévin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7604eb6db6435876d7490 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100943
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: