Understanding consciousness requires bridging theoretical models and clinically measurable brain dynamics. This review integrates three complementary frameworks that converge on a dynamical view of conscious processing: continuous formulations of Integrated Information Theory (IIT), attractor-landscape modeling of brain-state transitions, and perturbational complexity metrics from transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). Continuous-time IIT formalizes how integrated information evolves across temporal hierarchies, while dynamical-systems approaches show that consciousness emerges near criticality, where metastable attractors enable flexible transitions between partially synchronized states. Perturbational-complexity indices capture these properties empirically, quantifying the brain’s capacity for integration and differentiation even without behavioral responsiveness. Across anesthesia, disorders of consciousness, epilepsy, and neurodegeneration, TMS-EEG biomarkers reveal reduced complexity and altered synchronization consistent with structural and functional disconnection. Integrating multimodal data—diffusion MRI, fMRI, EEG, and causal perturbations—is consistent with individualized modeling of consciousness-related dynamics. Standardized protocols, mechanistically interpretable machine learning, and longitudinal validation are essential for clinical translation. By uniting information-theoretic, dynamical, and empirical perspectives, this framework offers a reproducible foundation for consciousness biomarkers that mechanistically link brain dynamics to subjective experience, paving the way for precision applications in neurology, psychiatry, and anesthesia.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Francisco J. Esteban
Eva Vargas
José A. Langa
Applied Sciences
Universidad de Sevilla
Universidad de Jaén
Numerical Method (China)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Esteban et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bfdff17b5dc6da021f21 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021056
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: