This paper argues that the standard cosmological model (SCM), understood as General Relativity plus ΛCDM plus Quantum Field Theory (GR + ΛCDM + QFT), has a legitimate epistemic domain restricted to Einstein spacetime inside galaxies and to local quantum fields in laboratories. Extending the same metric–field machinery to the vast cosmic vacuum and horizon-scale structure is a strong, unproven extrapolation. We formalise this as a category error: mathematics that is empirically validated for dense, field-dominated regions (P1) is assumed, without independent proof, to also describe the inter-galactic vacuum (P2) and the horizon-scale structure (P3). This leads to what we call a mathematical colonisation of the cosmic vacuum by GR/QFT tools (metric, curvature, quantum fields, entanglement) that may be structurally inappropriate. As an alternative, we introduce a Structural Brane–String Framework, the Dahli Cosmological Model (DCM/DSM), which rebuilds cosmology from mechanical cores (Planck tension, gravitational constant, speed of light) and from the dynamics of membranes and strings, rather than from GR/QFT fields on a smooth manifold. In this framework: • The cosmic vacuum and cosmic energy are structural (absolute) elements: a network of open membranes and open strings. • Dark matter and dark energy are fragile (derived) elements: collapsed membranes and compactified strings. We derive a structural depletion coefficient δ ≡ -ln(1-α ), where α is the fixed point of a non-linear brane phase equation. This δ controls: • Depletion of dark matter (DM) into the cosmic vacuum in the background expansion, • Suppression of structure growth fσ8 (the S8 tension), • A mild deviation of the dark-energy equation of state w(z) from -1. A value δ ≈ 0.3 is naturally obtained from the brane dynamics and is consistent with DESI BAO fits and with an observed ~10% suppression in fσ8. Thus a single structural parameter explains multiple large-scale tensions without introducing extra scalar fields or ad hoc
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dahli Chabane (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287240a974eb0d3c02a82 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18778632
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Dahli Chabane
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...