This paper formalizes authority and innovation as dual regimes within the Sofience–Δϕ (SΔϕ) series. Authority is defined as compression-driven convergence toward low-resistance default routes (Δϕ↓): accumulated pruning and cost reduction produce an attractor that becomes the system’s operational baseline. Innovation is defined as misfit-triggered re-opening (Δϕ↑): when accumulated mismatch (ε) between a system and its environment crosses a threshold, previously pruned alternatives become computable again and re-entry editing is activated. The central claim is that authority–innovation conflict is not a moral disagreement but a phase-transition signal (τ). This document provides minimal definitions (authority, compression, misfit, triggers, re-opening, authority debt), minimal axioms describing the compression–misfit–re-opening loop, and diagnostic regimes distinguishing stable authority, rigid authority (closure precursor), innovative re-opening, and suppressed innovation. Building on SΔϕ-23, the paper treats coupled environments (co-environmentalization) as an amplification regime where misfit, triggers, and authority debt propagate across systems. It also incorporates the SΔϕ-23 safety boundary—ontology–axiology separation—to prevent strong authority traces from being mistaken as moral legitimacy, which would automatically seal innovation as heresy and accelerate closure. Scope: minimal axioms and diagnostic structure; substrate-agnostic across individuals, organizations, and AI systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sofience
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sofience (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d867ec16d51705d2f337 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18808054
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: