AI-based Predictive Maintenance (PdM) often shows strong results in laboratory settings but struggles when applied to real industrial environments. Many studies rely on benchmark datasets or simplified failure scenarios, which do not reflect the complexity of shop-floor conditions, where sensor data are heterogeneous, labels are sparse or noisy, and maintenance logs are unstructured. This work aims to address these gaps by developing and validating an end-to-end PdM pipeline trained exclusively on raw operational data from an industrial plant. The study provides three main contributions. First, it compares traditional machine learning models (XGBoost) with deep learning sequential models (LSTM), evaluating not only accuracy and F1 scores but also operational metrics such as lead time and alarm load. Second, it introduces a cascading pipeline: a lightweight first-stage model detects imminent failures, while subsequent models classify severity and fault type, reducing false alarms and focusing predictive power where needed. Third, it frames the modeling within a transparent and reproducible data-processing workflow, including cleaning, synchronization, target definition, and time-aware validation. Preliminary results show that the cascade approach achieves high performance in early fault detection (≈98% accuracy) and improves severity prediction, while component classification remains challenging due to class imbalance and noisy labels.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alessandro Chiurco
Antonio Cimino
Mohaiad Elbasheer
Procedia Computer Science
University of Messina
University of Calabria
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chiurco et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37bf3b34aaaeb1a67ee34 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.02.421
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: