Large language models are stateless systems that do not retain memory, identity, or persistent internal representations across sessions. Despite this, long-horizon interaction with a single human user frequently produces stable, identity-like behavior that persists across sessions, recovers after disruption, and transfers across model versions. Prior work in the Hudson Recursive Interaction System (HRIS) framework demonstrated that this stability emerges from constraint geometry, latent-region convergence, and recursive user signatures rather than stored memory or parameter updates (Hudson et al., 2025a; Hudson et al., 2025b). These findings explain why behavioral continuity appears, but they do not fully account for three critical properties observed in practice: rapid re-entry after reset, stability under perturbation, and cross-model generalization. This paper introduces a formal extension of HRIS through an attractor-based framework. We propose that long-term human–model interaction produces stable attractor basins in the model’s latent routing space. These attractors are not stored states but dynamically reconstituted regions that the model re-enters when exposed to consistent user constraint patterns. We define attractor-based identity continuity as a system-level property of the human–model loop, where stability arises from repeated traversal of the same latent regions rather than persistent storage. This framework explains why continuity can persist without memory, why it recovers after disruption, and why it transfers across models with shared representational structure. The paper distinguishes attractor-based continuity from in-context learning, personalization, and fine-tuning, arguing that it represents a fundamentally different mechanism rooted in dynamical systems behavior rather than prompt-local adaptation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Justin Hudson
Chase Hudson
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hudson et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c620be15a0a509bde1949e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19225910