Theory of Relational Accommodation

The theory of relational accommodation postulates that our universe is a specific set of coherently accommodating relations between logical probabilities. This set of accommodating probabilities exists in a bigger framework: the ground state of everything. In this ground state all logical probabilities and their relations exist simultaneously in superposition. This ground state cannot be absolutely nothing, because without even potential, nothing could logically exist. The ground state cannot be some specific probabilities because then it would logically be something. So from a strictly logical perspective the only way something can be nothing is when it is all logical probabilities at once. Because it is not differentiated it is nothing specific and therefore akin to nothing. It is pure potential. Without dimensions. The probabilities in the ground state must be logical. If they are not logical then endless unpredictable realities would arise and no stable reality can form. In this ground state of pure potential there are relations between probabilities. If a relation changes then they all change to accommodate for the change. If a set of relations is coherent then all relations in the set can interact in a way that is coherent with the set. For the set a specific reality forms: the coherence with the set. If a set of relations is stable then it exists further. Our universe is such a set of relations. As long as probabilities and relations are coherent with our set of accommodating relations then they are real to us. The rest is filtered out. They could be part of another set of coherent relations but that set doesn’t share coherence with our set, so we can’t see the other set. To go even further: it would then not exist to us. If one accepts this conclusion, one starts to see that everything must be an accommodated set of relations between probabilities that is part of the total set that is our universe. Once this conclusion has been drawn the next step is to see that particles or massive objects are in fact an enormous number of accommodating relations that must be processed to maintain coherence within the set. Therefore it seems logical that mass is a set of accommodating relations between probabilities. This means that to process a certain amount of mass it would take an amount of time to process the relations. This would mean there are more or less dense areas of processing. This different amount of time it takes to process relations, creates differences in dimensions. Therefore dimensions are not fundamental. They emerge when a coherent set of relations needs to process to stay coherent. I found that there is even a formula to describe this. The system accommodation load of a mass (S) in rest is related to the smallest amount of relations that has dimensions. This is the Planck unit consisting of the Planck time and the Planck length. S (m) = m ∙ lP / tP / r (or since lP / tP = c: ) S (m) = m ∙ c / r. It is in fact the proportion of mass and volume (radius) versus the smallest unit of relations. The system accommodation load is expressed in kg/s. The system accommodation load (S) in itself has relevance if one correlates this to the frame of dimensions it causes. I call this frame A_ (xyzt). What is frame A? Frame A is the capacity for creating space and time that is left over when the relations of a specific mass have been processed. The maximum amount of relations a Planck unit can process, is also known in existing physics. Its S = c³ / G. It is the light speed to the third power divided by the gravitational constant. This number represents the maximum accommodating capacity in kg/s of a Planck unit. Therefore frame A_ (xyzt) = 1 – S (m) / Sₘax. To calculate the dimension frame of a mass and therefore relate distance of time to this mass one can use A. Another addition is that if the object has speed more relations have to be accommodated. This can be added by multiplying with the Lorentz factor (gamma v) γᵥ = 1 / √ 1 – v² / c² which leads to formula: S (m) = (m ∙ c / r) ∙ γᵥ. If an object is moving through a space with multiple masses with different speeds the formula gets like this. Sₜotal = Sₒbj1 + Sₒbj 2 + Sₒbj x + … (relative r to obj1). With frame Aₜotal = 1 – Sₜotal / Sₘax. The results of this calculation are remarkably similar to General Relativity. Except for very heavy objects, when a small deviation is seen. It would be an object for research to analyse why this difference exists. Another factor which can be added is temperature. The reason for that is that raising temperature means more speed for particles. This is an extra gamma factor, which I suspect could be γT = 1 / √ 1 – v²Th / c² or γT = 1 + Q / mc² or SQ = Q / rc (S = Sₘ + SQ). Adding γT leads to formula S (m) = (m ∙ c / r) ∙ γᵥ ∙ γT expressed in S (kg/s) where m: v: T is an exchange ratio.